cdr

Hot Keywords
Drug Resistance Mechanisms Epigenetic Resistance in Cancer Therapy Biomarkers Pharmacogenetics of Cancer Liquid Biopsy Targeted Cancer Therapy Non-coding RNAs Kinase Inhibitors ABC Transporters

Top
Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:881-884.10.20517/cdr.2021.75© The Author(s) 2021.
Open AccessCommentary

Overcoming acquired chemo-resistance to gemcitabine: implications from the perspective of multi-modal therapy including surgery for pancreatic cancer

Department of Surgery I, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan.

Correspondence to: Prof. Fuyuhiko Motoi, Department of Surgery I, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan. E-mail: fmotoi@med.id.yamagata-u.ac.jp

    Views:143 | Downloads:45 | Cited:0 | Comments:0 | :0
    Academic Editor: Godefridus J. Peters | Copy Editor: Xi-Jun Chen | Production Editor: Xi-Jun Chen
    ...

    © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    Abstract

    Gemcitabine has been used as a key drug for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although surgery remains the mainstay for cure of this lethal disease, the effect is quite limited, even for resectable disease, if there is no collaboration with chemotherapy. In the cases with unresectable disease, conversion surgery after a favorable response to chemotherapy might show encouraging results. Potentiation of chemotherapeutic agent is urgently needed in almost all stages of pancreatic cancer. Further efforts must be paid on overcoming chemo-resistance by understanding tumor diversity and developing biomarkers that follow recent success of modified conventional agents by drug delivery technology.

    Saiki et al.[1] successfully described a fine, exciting, and comprehensive review about gemcitabine metabolism from the perspective of overcoming acquired chemo-resistance in cancer cells, which was published in Cancer Drug Resistance. Gemcitabine has been widely used as a key drug for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is globally one of the most lethal diseases with an extremely low survival rate, as they mentioned in their manuscript[1]. Although PDAC is known to be a chemo-resistant cancer with a low response rate to several conventional agents, recent advances in drug delivery technology have shown that improved delivery of conventional anti-cancer agents, such as paclitaxel (modified to Nab-Paclitaxel[2]) or irinotecan (modified to Nanoliposomal irinotecan[3]) significantly increased their clinical efficacy in cancer treatment[2,3]. Although gemcitabine is an effective agent, further improvement in its activity to obtain the similar success as with the above drugs, might be achieved, as the authors precisely described in their review[1]. This commentary is aimed to clarify the implication of overcoming chemo-resistance in PDAC treatment from the perspective of multi-modal therapy including surgery to improve the survival outcome of the lethal disease.

    Although the mainstay of treatment that provides the only chance for cure of PDAC is curative surgery, the effect of surgery alone on survival is quite limited, as was unfortunately confirmed by the discouraging results of several randomized control trials evaluating the effect of extended resection[4]. The fact that most patients with PDAC after curative resection experience early distant relapse[5] indicates that there might be occult micro-metastases outside the surgical field at the time of surgery. Even with curative surgery for resectable PDAC, the serum tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), often shows sustained elevation after resection, followed by metastatic relapse in the liver (outside of the planned surgical field)[6,7]. To improve survival outcomes, surgical resection of the primary tumor load should be planned, taking appropriate measures to reduce micrometastases. Combining effective systemic chemotherapy and surgery, including the concepts of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy, has improved the survival outcomes of surgery for PDAC[8]. Since several solid studies support the significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant treatment has become the gold standard for patients with curatively resected PDAC[9-12]. Recently, the Prep-02/JSAP05 study[13] revealed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy provided significant survival benefit and prolonged survival compared to upfront surgery, which has until recently been the gold standard approach for resectable PDAC[14]. Pooled analysis of randomized control trials also revealed the significantly longer disease-free survival and higher R0 resection rate obtained by neoadjuvant intervention[15]. Moreover, even in cases with unresectable PDAC at the initial diagnosis, conversion surgery after a favorable response to chemotherapy showed encouraging results[16]. Total neoadjuvant therapy, which consists of long-term multi-drug systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery, also demonstrated impressive survival outcomes for locally advanced unresectable PDAC[17]. The progress of a multidisciplinary treatment strategy including surgery for PDAC relies on the recent advances in systemic chemotherapy for PDAC. Even in PDAC cases with a poor prognosis[17,18], development of key new drugs, as suggested by Saiki et al.[1], might overcome the dismal prognosis by improving both chemotherapy and multidisciplinary strategies including surgery. Further efforts to improve the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents are essentially needed to confirm the progress of the strategy. Recent advances in the understanding of tumor heterogeneity by gene-expression profiling might uncover principles with clinical implications, finding a key to improve the outcome[19]. Establishment of potential biomarkers for drug activity is also important to benefit specific treatment especially in PDAC with gemcitabine[20].

    Overall, I greatly appreciate this work by Saiki et al.[1] and agree that further studies are needed for gemcitabine-based treatment to be included in personalized medicine tailored for numerous molecular therapeutic targets in multiple pathogenic pathways.

    DECLARATIONS

    Authors’ contributions

    The author contributed solely to the article.

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K09209.

    Conflicts of interest

    The author declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2021.

    References

    • 1. Saiki Y, Hirota S, Horii A. Attempts to remodel the pathways of gemcitabine metabolism: recent approaches to overcoming tumours with acquired chemoresistance. Cancer Drug Resist 2020;3:819-31.

      DOI
    • 2. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1691-703.

      DOIPubMedPMC
    • 3. Wang-gillam A, Li C, Bodoky G, et al. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016;387:545-57.

      DOIPubMed
    • 4. Jang JY, Kang JS, Han Y, et al. Long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of standard versus extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:426-33.

      DOIPubMed
    • 5. Matsumoto I, Murakami Y, Shinzeki M, et al. Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: a multi-center retrospective study. Pancreatology 2015;15:674-80.

      DOIPubMed
    • 6. Motoi F, Rikiyama T, Katayose Y, Egawa S, Unno M. Retrospective evaluation of the influence of postoperative tumor marker status on survival and patterns of recurrence after surgery for pancreatic cancer based on RECIST guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:371-9.

      DOIPubMed
    • 7. Motoi F, Murakami Y, Okada KI, et al. Multicenter Study Group of Pancreatobiliary Surgery (MSG-PBS). Sustained elevation of postoperative serum level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is high-risk stigmata for primary hepatic recurrence in patients with curatively resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 2019;43:634-41.

      DOIPubMed
    • 8. Parmar A, Chaves-Porras J, Saluja R, et al. Adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020;145:102817.

      DOIPubMed
    • 9. Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 2013;310:1473-81.

      DOIPubMed
    • 10. Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;389:1011-24.

      DOIPubMed
    • 11. Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet 2016;388:248-57.

      DOIPubMed
    • 12. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. Canadian Cancer Trials Group and the Unicancer-GI-PRODIGE Group. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2395-406.

      DOIPubMed
    • 13. Motoi F, Kosuge T, Ueno H, et al. Study Group of Preoperative Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer (Prep) and Japanese Study Group of Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic cancer (JSAP). Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019;49:190-4.

      DOIPubMed
    • 14. Unno M, Motoi F, Matsuyama Y, et al. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP-05). J Clin Oncol 2019;37:189.

      DOI
    • 15. Birrer DL, Golcher H, Casadei R, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: a new standard of care. Pooled data from three randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2021; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005126.

      DOIPubMed
    • 16. Satoi S, Yamaue H, Kato K, et al. Role of adjuvant surgery for patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer with a long-term favorable response to non-surgical anti-cancer treatments: results of a project study for pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20:590-600.

      DOIPubMed
    • 17. Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX in combination with losartan followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:1020-7.

      DOIPubMedPMC
    • 18. Philip PA, Lacy J, Portales F, et al. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPACT): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:285-94.

      DOIPubMed
    • 19. Adam RS, Blomberg I, Ten Hoorn S, Bijlsma MF, Vermeulen L. The recurring features of molecular subtypes in distinct gastrointestinal malignancies-A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021;164:103428.

      DOIPubMed
    • 20. Randazzo O, Papini F, Mantini G, et al. "Open Sesame?": biomarker status of the human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 and molecular mechanisms influencing its expression and activity in the uptake and cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:3206.

      DOIPubMedPMC

    Cite This Article

    Motoi F. Overcoming acquired chemo-resistance to gemcitabine: implications from the perspective of multi-modal therapy including surgery for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:881-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2021.75

    Views
    143
    Downloads
    45
    Citations
     0
    Comments
    0

    0

    Comments

    Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

    Article Access Statistics

    • Viewed: 143
    • Downloaded: 45
    • Cited: Crossref0

    Share This Article

    See Updates

    © 2016-2021 OAE Publishing Inc., except certain content provided by third parties