Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery,
Correspondence Address: Prof. Yutaka Yamamoto, Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-1-1, Honjo, Chuo-ku, 860-8556, Kumamoto, Japan. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Despite several advances in targeted therapies for breast cancer, breast-cancer-associated death remains high in women. This is partially due to the lack of reliable markers predicting metastatic disease or recurrence after initial therapy. Recent research into the clinical validity of circulating cancer-specific biomarkers as a “liquid biopsy” is of growing interest. Of these, exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising candidate biomarkers for clinical use in breast cancer. In addition to their diagnostic value, exosomal miRNAs play an important role in predicting clinical outcome or treatment response. In this review, it is focused on the findings concerning exosomal miRNAs in relation to disease detection, prognostic impact and therapeutic effect in breast cancer, and discuss their clinical utility.
Exosomal miRNA, breast cancer, liquid biopsy
Breast cancer is one of the most commonly-diagnosed cancers worldwide and one of the leading causes of cancer death in women. Improvements in the early detection of breast cancer by conventional screening programs or development of novel molecular-targeted therapy may contribute to the reduction of breast cancer-related death. Breast cancer represents a heterogenous disease with varied biological characteristics and clinical outcomes. Based on molecular subtypes, namely, the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), the disease is classified into four distinct subtypes; luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple negative (TN)[3,4]. A better understanding of these subtypes is required to determine the need for appropriate therapy, such as endocrine therapies, chemotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapies. Although these therapies are commonly used for early breast cancer patients, some have experienced resistance following therapy, leading to loco-regional or distant recurrence[5,6]. Many efforts have been made to explore the potential of various biomarkers to predict clinical outcome or treatment response[7-9], nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of resistance to therapy are still poorly elucidated.
Currently, clinical determinations of treatment are based on biopsies of tumor tissues, that may not be representative of the entire tumor burden[10,11]. To overcome the problem of tumor heterogeneity, the novel diagnostic tool which is referred to as a “liquid biopsy” is an ideal methodology[12,13]. In recent years, there have been a number of advances in the field of molecular profiling to accurately predict clinical outcome and treatment response in early breast cancer. Circulating cancer-specific biomarkers can be evaluated by minimally-invasive techniques and are easily accessible to analyze compared to tissue sampling, as well as providing a real-time assessment. To date, several candidate biomarkers, including RNA, microRNA (miRNA), DNA, and proteins, have been suggested.
MiRNAs are single-stranded and non-coding RNAs with 19 to 22 nucleotides in length, which regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by binding to partially-complementary sites in the 3’-untranslated regions of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to translational repression or regulation of mRNA degradation[17,18]. Bioinformatic techniques have revealed that each miRNA has binding affinity to hundreds of target genes. They are known to act functionally as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Besides their intracellular function, there are some evidences of miRNA activity in cell to cell communication. In breast cancer, the expression of miRNAs is frequently deregulated during tumorigenesis as well as various types of cancer. To date, numerous miRNAs are reported to be valuable biomarkers for critical regulators of tumor initiation, metastasis and chemoresistance[22-24]. In particular, circulating miRNAs can be found in several different body fluids and reflect specific disease types. After released into the blood circulation, miRNAs are commonly incorporated into microvesicles, bound to lipoproteins such as HDL, or form complexes with Argonaute-2 (Ago2) proteins. It has been suggested that the majority of miRNAs in circulation are selectively concentrated in exosomes[26,27] and exosomal miRNAs are considered the main source of circulating miRNAs.
Exosomes are small membranous vesicles with a diameter of 30-100 nm and consisting of lipid, proteins, DNA, miRNAs and mRNAs. They are actively secreted from various types of cells into the circulation. They can be transferred from primary tumor cells to distant organs via the circulation; thus, they reflect the origin of the secreting cells. The cancer-derived exosomes may be important mediators of intercellular communication[28,29] and the presence of miRNA in exosomes was first reported by Valadi et al.. Exosomal miRNAs are the most abundant and crucial biomolecules which play a pivotal role in implementing the tumor microenvironment and the growth and metastasis of cancer cells. They have been proposed as novel circulating biomarkers for the early detection of several types of cancers[30-32], based on findings indicating that cancer patients have greater amounts of circulating exosomes than those in healthy controls[33,34].
There have been many reports on circulating miRNAs, whereas limited data are available regarding exosomal miRNAs. In this review, we focus on the role of exosomal miRNAs as markers for possible applications in breast cancer detection, prognosis, and response to treatment. Moreover, we discuss the issue of exosome research in terms of clinical application.
Exosomal miRNAs in body fluids have potentials of the novel circulating biomarkers for the detection of several cancers[30-32], based on findings indicating that cancer patients have elevated levels of tumor-derived exosomes in blood, compared with those in healthy controls[33,34]. To date, there have been few studies involving analysis of exosomal miRNAs in the diagnosis of breast cancer [Table 1]. In one study, miR-1246 and miR-21 in plasma exosomes were reported to be useful indicators of breast cancer diagnosis. These miRNAs could successfully differentiate breast cancer patients from healthy control subjects. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.73 to differentiate them when miR-1246 and miR-21 were combined in the analysis, that is considered moderate performance. MiR-1246 suppressed the expression of Cyclin G2, leading to breast cancer progression. A recent study by Li et al. indicated the potential use of an exosomal miR-106a-363 cluster as a novel diagnostic biomarker. Four plasma-derived exosomal miRNAs (miR-106a-3p, miR-106a-5p, miR-20b-5p, and miR-92a-2-5p), and four serum-derived miRNAs (miR-106a-5p, miR-19b-3p, miR-20b-5p, and miR-92a-3p) from breast cancer patients were expressed at significantly higher levels than those from healthy controls. Interestingly, two overlapping miRNAs (miR-106a-5p and miR-20b-5p) were consistently upregulated also in breast cancer tissues. The functional mechanisms of the miR-106a-363 cluster in breast cancer have not been fully reported, whereas all but one miRNA (miR-106a-3p) are involved in the “proteoglycans in cancer” pathway according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis.
Exosomal miRNAs as diagnostic markers for breast cancer
|miRNAs||Sample increased expressions||Indicator||Ref.|
|miR-1246, miR-21||Patient plasma sample
Plasma of PDX
|Increased expressions are biomarkers of detection for breast cancer|||
|miR-106a-3p, miR-106a-5p, miR-20b-5p, and miR-92a-2-5p||Patient plasma sample||Increased expressions are biomarkers of detection for breast cancer|||
|miR-106a-5p, miR-19b-3p, miR-20b-5p, and miR-92a-3p||Patient serum sample||Increased expressions are biomarkers of detection for breast cancer|||
|miR-101, miR-372||Patient serum sample||Increased expressions are biomarkers of detection for breast cancer|||
|miR-373||Patient serum sample||Exosomal miR-373 is higher in receptor-negative and TN tumors than in hormone receptor-positive cancer|||
|miR-335, miR-628, and miR-422a||Patient plasma sample||Combined scores could discriminate between triple negative- and HER2-positive breast cancer patients|||
|miR-223-3p||Patient plasma sample||The expression level is higher in the patients with IDC than DCIS|||
|miR-16, miR-30b, and miR-93||Patient plasma sample||MiR-93 was higher in DCIS patients than in healthy women, but lower in IDC patients|||
Differential expressions of subtype-specific miRNAs have also been reported in several studies[27,37]. Eichelser et al. analyzed circulating cell-free and exosomal miR-101, miR-372, and miR-373 in preoperative blood serum. In analyses of 50 breast cancer patients and 12 healthy women, the levels of exosomal miR-101 and miR-372 were significantly higher in the serum of patients with breast cancer than in healthy controls. Moreover, the levels of circulating exosomal miR-373 were higher in receptor-negative and TN tumors than in hormone receptor-positive carcinomas or healthy controls. In addition, Stevic et al. also demonstrated different exosomal miRNA signatures in HER2-positive and TN breast cancer patients. The expression levels of exosomal miRNA in plasma of 435 breast cancer patients, consisting of 211 HER2-positive and 224 TN patients, were analyzed. The analysis revealed that the expression of five miRNAs were higher and 13 were lower in HER2-positive than in TN breast cancer patients. Among them, exosomal miR-335, miR-628, and miR-422a were combined into a logistic regression model and these combined scores could discriminate between TN and HER2-positive breast cancer patients with a sensitivity 68% and a specificity of 81%. This is the first study to measure the exosomal miRNAs derived from a large cohort of 435 breast cancer patients, further indicating the different exosomal miRNA patterns among subtypes.
Several studies have compared exosomal miRNAs derived from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)[38,39]. It has been demonstrated that the miR-223-3p levels of IDC patients showed the highest fold-change compared with those in DCIS patients and healthy controls. In vitro analysis revealed that transfection of MCF-7 cells with the miR-223-3p gene significantly promoted cell proliferation and cell invasion ability. In another study, exosomal miR-16, miR-30b, and miR-93 were analyzed in 111 IDC patients, 42 DCIS patients, and 39 healthy women. The level of exosomal miR-16 was higher in the plasma of breast cancer and DCIS patients than in healthy women. Meanwhile exosomal miR-93 was higher in DCIS patients than in healthy women, but lower in IDC patients. These findings suggest that the different signatures of the corresponding miRNAs are associated with a particular biology of breast tumors. This may be promising for the identification of biomarkers if specific miRNAs could be used to distinguish DCIS cases that have a higher likelihood of future disease progression. Taken together, these findings suggest that several exosomal miRNAs could be good candidates for early breast cancer detection and differentiation of tumor subtypes.
Several miRNAs derived from exosomes can be involved in tumor metastasis and recurrence of breast cancer. There are a few articles revealing an association between exosomal miRNAs derived from breast cancer patients and clinical outcome. One of them, by Ni et al., described analysis using a PCR-based microarray which contained 47 different miRNAs in exosomes derived from the plasma of 32 breast cancer patients. They observed differences in the levels of six miRNAs between primary and recurrent breast cancer. In particular, the levels of miR-20a and miR-30b were lower in exosomes from recurrent cases than in those from primary breast cancer patients. The functions of the corresponding miRNAs are unclear, but miR-30b may regulate the Cyclin E2 gene (CCNE2)[40,41]. Ichikawa et al. demonstrated that trastuzumab induced the expression of miR-30b in breast cancer cells and upregulation of this gene inhibited cell growth by targeting CCNE2. According to the finding, downregulation of miR-30b may be involved in trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. In another study, we have previously demonstrated differential expression of exosomal miRNAs between breast cancer patients with and without recurrence. Of 384 miRNAs, three (miR-338, miR-340, and miR-124) were significantly upregulated and eight (miR-29b, miR-20b, miR-17, miR-130a, miR-18a, miR-195, miR-486, and miR-93) were significantly downregulated in patients with recurrence. In contrast to growing evidence of diagnostic potential for exosomal miRNAs, there is limited data concerning their prognostic potentials.
Functional studies in cell lines or xenograft models have also revealed that exosome-mediated transfer of several miRNAs has been implicated in promoting tumor growth, cell invasion and preparation of a metastatic niche [Table 2]. Accumulating evidence has indicated that recipient cells that have basically no metastatic potential could gain metastatic characteristics by receiving several miRNAs via exosomes. The miR-200 family, which regulates the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) as well as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), is enriched in the circulation of patients with metastatic cancers. Le et al. revealed that taking miR-200-rich exosomes from metastatic 4T1 cells and co-culturing them with poorly-metastatic 4T07 cells resulted in transfer of miR-200 and downregulation of ZEB2 which caused the 4T07 cells to revert to an E-cadherin-expressing epithelial phenotype. Moreover, when the 4T07 cells were treated systemically with 4T1 exosomes, the incidence of lung metastasis increased. More recently, a study by Kia et al. showed that poorly-metastatic breast cancer cells (MCF-7) treated with exosomes derived from highly-metastatic breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) displayed overexpression of miR-9 and miR-155, which target the tumor suppressor genes, PTEN and DUSP14. They demonstrated that the corresponding miRNAs were enriched in metastatic TN breast cancer and could be transferred into other cells to alter the expression of target genes.
Functional studies of exosomal miRNAs related to breast cancer development
|miR-141, miR-200a/b/c, miR-429||Cancer cells (4TO7)||Cancer cells (4T1E)||Metastatic potential|||
|miR-9, miR-155||PTEN, DUSP14||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231)||Breast cancer cells (MCF-7)||Metastatic potential|||
|miR-105||ZO-1||Breast cancer cells (MCF-10A & MDA-MB-231)||Endothelial cells||Destroy tight junction and increase vascular permeability|||
|miR-939||VE-cadherin||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231)||Endothelial cells||Destroy the barrier function of endothelial monolayers|||
|miR-181c||PDPK1||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, D3H2LN)||Endothelial cells||Destroy the blood-brain barrier Promote brain metastasis|||
|miR-19a||PTEN, CCL2||Astrocyte||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, HCC1954)||Promote brain metastasis Increase proliferation and reduce apoptosis|||
|miR-10b||HOXD10, KLF4||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231)||Epithelial cells||Increase migration and invasion|||
|miR-23b||MARCKS||Mesenchymal stem cells||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231)||Induce dormancy in bone marrow|||
|miR-127, miR-107, miR-222, miR-223||CXCR12||Mesenchymal stem cells||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, T47D)||Induce dormancy in bone marrow|||
|miR-222, miR-223||Mesenchymal stem cells||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, T47D)||Induce dormancy in bone marrow|||
|miR-223||Mef2c-β-catenin||Breast cancer cells (SKBR3)||IL-4 activated macrophages||Increase cell invasion|||
|miR-21, miR-378e, miR-143||Fibroblast||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, T47D, BT549)||Increase EMT phenotype and stemness properties|||
|miR-122||PKM, CS||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231)||Fibroblast, neurons, microglia||Reprogrammed glucose metabolism|||
|Let-7, miR-23b, miR-27a/b, miR-21, miR-320||PLAU*, AMOTL1*, NRP1*, ETS2*||Breast cancer cells (MCF7, MDA-MB-231)||Endothelial cells||Angiogenesis|||
|miR-134||STAT5B, Hsp90||Breast cancer cells (Hs578Ts(i)8)||Breast cancer cells (Hs578T)||Decrease migration and invasion|||
|miR-503||CCND2, CCND3||Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231)||Endothelial cells||Decrease cell proliferation and invasion|||
During multiple steps of the metastatic process, cancer cells lose adhesion to the extracellular matrix and migrate into the circulation to reach the pre-metastatic niche. Exosomal miRNAs are implicated in these processes, which include cell migration, invasion, angiogenesis, bone marrow dormancy and reprogrammed metabolism. Exosomal miR-105 is reported to be released by cancer cells, which then destroys tight junctions and the integrity of natural barriers against metastasis. MiR-105 is considered to be a potent regulator of migration, acting by targeting the tight junction protein ZO-1, leading to increased vascular permeability in distant organs. Similarly, the role of exosome-associated miR-939 in breast cancer has also been investigated. This gene is a candidate to target VE-cadherin, a component of the adherens junctions involved in vessel permeability. The authors revealed that miR-939 was found to be highly expressed in TN subtypes catalogued in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. In the analysis of their cohort of 63 TN breast cancer patients, patients with high expression of miR-939 and nodal involvement showed a 6-fold higher risk of relapse compared to those without. Further, analysis of TN breast cancer cell lines showed that miR-939 directly targets VE-cadherin leading to an increase in permeability of a monolayer of human umbilical vascular endothelial cells.
MiR-181c is involved in migration of cancer cells through the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Tominaga et al. demonstrated that injection of brain metastatic cancer cell-derived exosomes into the tail vein of mice resulted in more brain metastasis compared with mice treated with human mammary tumor cell-derived exosomes.The exosome-derived miR-181c promotes destruction of the BBB through the abnormal localization of actin via downregulation of its target gene, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDPK1). In analysis of breast cancer patients (n = 56), miR-181c in exosomes collected from brain metastasis patients (n = 10) was significantly higher compared with non-brain metastasis patients (n = 46), suggesting an important role of miR-181c in clinical utility for brain metastatic cancer. In addition, astrocyte-derived exosomal miR-19a has been reported to contribute to brain metastasis. Zhang et al. showed that breast tumors after dissemination to the brain lost PTEN expression, which was regulated by miRNAs from astrocytes. Astrocyte-derived exosomal miR-19a reversibly downregulated PTEN expression in cancer cells, leading to increased secretion of cytokine chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) and recruitment of myeloid cells to enhance outgrowth of brain metastatic tumor cells. Their findings signify the dynamic and reciprocal cross-talk between tumor cells and the metastatic niche.
Another study by Singh et al. demonstrated that miR-10b was highly expressed in metastatic breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells compared to non-metastatic breast cancer cells. Also, exosomal miR-10b secreted from MDA-MB-231 cells increased the invasive ability of nonmalignant immortalized human mammary epithelial cells. In particular, neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2) or ceramide promoted secretion of exosomal miR-10b which then suppressed the protein level of its target genes such as Homeobox D10 (HOXD10) and Kruppel Like Factor 4 (KLF4), indicating functional significance.
Breast cancer patients often experience recurrence decades after initial treatment and this seems to involve dormancy in the bone marrow. Currently, there is growing research interest focusing on how different microenvironments affect bone marrow dormancy, and exosomes can play a crucial role in this. One study has revealed an association of miR-23b with bone marrow dormancy. Ono et al. generated a bone marrow-metastatic human breast cancer cell line (BM2). Co-culture of BM2 and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) revealed suppression of proliferation, a decrease in stem cell-like properties, and inhibition of invasion in BM2 cells. MiR-23b derived from BM-MSCs can induce dormancy through the suppression of a target gene, myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS), which encodes a protein that promotes cell cycling and motility. In a cohort of 10 patients, miR-23b expression was increased in metastatic bone lesions compared to matched primary breast tumors. In another study, bone marrow stromal cell-derived miR-127, miR-197, miR-222, and miR-223 led to cancer cell quiescence via down-regulation of CXCR12, a chemokine that interacts with CXR4 and CXR7 receptors. Cancer cells entering quiescence or cell cycle arrest could acquire resistance to chemotherapy. Bliss et al. revealed that breast cancer cells prime mesenchymal stem cells to release exosomes containing miR-222/223, which in turn promotes quiescence in a subset of breast cancer. In an immunodeficient mouse model of dormant breast cancer, therapy with antagomiR-222/223 sensitized breast cancer cells to carboplatin-based therapy and increased host survival.MiR-223 is also regarded as a specific miRNA for tumor-associated macrophages. In a co-culture system, miR-223 released from IL-4-activated macrophages could be transferred to MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, leading to promotion of invasion of breast cancer cells via disruption of the Mef2c-β-catenin pathway.
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are vital constituents of the tumor microenvironment and play a major role in cancer initiation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis of breast cancer. Donnarumma et al. have demonstrated that breast cancer cells exposed to CAF exosomes containing miR-21, miR-378e, and miR-143, exhibited a significantly increased capacity to promote stemness properties, EMT phenotype, and anchorage-independent cell growth. Thus, the release of CAF exosomes may be responsible for the delivery of miRNAs that promote oncogenic signaling in breast cancer cells. In a large cohort of TCGA database breast cancer patients (n = 744), the patients with lower levels of miR-378 had longer overall survival, suggestive of a prognostic role for this gene.
Reprogrammed glucose metabolism is an emerging hallmark of cancer and several miRNAs have been implicated in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Fong et al. showed that cancer cells suppress glucose uptake by non-tumor cells in the pre-metastatic niche, by secreting exosomal miR-122 that downregulates the target genes pyruvate kinase (PKM) and citrate synthase (CS). Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that exosomal miR-122 can reprogram the glucose metabolism of lung fibroblasts, brain astrocytes, and neurons that are abundantly present in the pre-metastatic sites of breast cancer.
Some miRNAs are involved in modulation of angiogenesis. Hannafon et al. collected exosomes from MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells after treatment with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Several miRNAs (let-7a, miR-23b, miR-27a/b, miR-21, let-7, and miR-320b) were increased by DHA treatment in exosomes from breast cancer cell lines, but not in exosomes from normal breast cells. Exosomes derived from DHA-treated MCF-7 cells increased expression of the above miRNAs in recipient endothelial cells. Furthermore, the transfection of miR-23b and miR-320b into endothelial cells decreased expression of their pro-angiogenic target gene (PLAU, AMOTL1, NRP1 and ETS2) and significantly inhibited tubular formation. These data suggest that the miRNAs transferred by exosomes mediate the anti-angiogenic action of DHA and support its potential use in cancer therapy. These findings demonstrate the capacity of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the tumor microenvironment to exert antitumor effects by down-regulating vascular endothelial growth factor expression in recipient cancer cells.
The current treatment option for breast cancer varies according to tumor subtype or disease stage, which includes chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, molecular-targeted therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Approximately 70% of breast cancer tumors express ER and patients with ER-positive tumors are candidates for endocrine therapy. It is a major issue if cancer cells acquire resistance to endocrine therapy. There have been several studies analyzing miRNAs related to treatment resistance, but there are only limited reports focusing on the exosomal miRNAs in resistance to endocrine therapy; we found only one article focused on this topic. Wei et al. suggested that exosomal miR-221/222 may be responsible for tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. They generated tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 (TamR) cells and compared them to tamoxifen-sensitive MCF-7 (wt) cells. They found that exosomes derived from MCF-7 (TamR) cells were able to enter into MCF-7 (wt) cells, enhancing tamoxifen resistance in recipient MCF-7 cells. The elevated miR-221/222 effectively reduced the expression of the target genes P27 and ERα. These findings are supported by another study by Miller et al., revealing that tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells display up-regulation of miR-221/222 and significant reductions in p27 levels. Taken together, these findings suggest that anti-miR-221/222 may be a potential therapeutic target to overcome tamoxifen resistance.
Anthracycline and taxane-containing agents are most commonly used as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer, but their efficacy is often limited by the emergence of chemoresistance. The acquisition of chemoresistance requires multiple regulatory changes of the tumor microenvironment, some of which are caused by exosomes. To improve the clinical outcome of cancer patients, accurate biomarkers for early prediction of response or resistance to chemotherapy are needed.
There have been few studies concerning the association between exosomal miRNAs and treatment efficacy in the clinical setting. We found one article by Stevic et al. on this topic. They analyzed several exosomal miRNAs which were determined based on analysis with a microRNA array card using the patients’ plasma samples before neoadjuvant therapy (GeparSixto trial). The expression of miR-155 and miR-301 in exosomes of HER2-positive and TN breast cancer patients most significantly predicted pathological complete response (pCR) which is considered as a surrogate marker for prognosis, in uni- and multivarite models. MiR-301 regulates the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)/Akt and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways[64,65] and also binds to the ESR 1 gene, leading to estrogen-independent growth of breast cancer.
In contrast, we identified several functional studies using cell lines to investigate the association of exosomal miRNAs with drug response [Table 3 and Figure 1]. Basically, it is emphasized that drug-resistant breast cancer cells can deliver exosomal miRNAs to sensitive cells to spread resistance. In some studies, individual exosomal miRNAs were examined. Li et al. focused on the exosomal miR-1246, which has been reported to function as a protooncogene in lung and other cancers. In their study, miR-1246 was highly expressed in metastatic breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells compared to non-metastatic breast cancer cells or non-malignant breast cells. Further, the transferred miR-1246 promoted invasion in non-malignant human mammary epithelial (HMLE) cells in part by targeting Cyclin G2 (CCNG2). The HMLE cells, after treatment with exosomes from MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with miR-1246, gained resistance to docetaxel, epirubicin, and gemcitabine.
Exosomal miRNAs related to response to drug in breast cancer
|miRNAs||Target genes||Sample source||Drug||Functions||References|
|miR-221, miR-222||p27, ERα||MCF-7||Tamoxifen||MiR-221/222 enhance tamoxifen resistance in recipient cells.|||
|miR-155, miR-301||Plasma||Paclitaxel, doxorubicin, carboplatin||Predict pathological complete response (pCR)|||
|miR-1246||CCNG2||MDA-MB-231||Docetaxel, epirubisin, gemcitabine||Cells transfected with miR-1246 induce drug resistance|||
|miR-222||PTEN||MCF-7||Adriamycin, docetaxel||High expression levels of miRNAs correlate to drug-resistance cells||[68,69]|
|miR-100, miR-30a, miR-17||MCF-7||Adriamycin, docetaxel||High expression levels of miRNAs correlate to drug-resistant cells|||
|miR-1246, miR1268a, miR-149-3a, miR-423-5a, miR-4298, miR-4438, miR-4644, miR-671-5p, miR-7107-5p, miR7847||MDA-MB-231||Docetaxel||Ten miRNAs were up-regulated in docetaxel-resistant cells|||
|miR-138-5p, miR-139-5p, miR-197-3p, miR-210-3p, miR-3178, miR423-5p, miR-4258, miR-4443, miR-574-3p, miR-6780b-3p, miR-744-5p||MDA-MB-231||Epirubicin||Eleven miRNAs were up-regulated in epirubicin-resistant cells|||
|miR-138-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-210-3p, miR-3613-5p||MDA-MB-231||Vinorelbine||Four miRNAs were up-regulated in vinorelbine-resistant cells|||
|miR-23a-3p, miR-27a-3p, miR-30a-5p, miR-320a, miR-455-3p*||MCF7||Adriamycin||Adriamycin-resistant cells correlate to pathway of “transcriptional misregulation in cancer“|||
|miR-142-3p, miR-155-5p||APC||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin||Correlate to drug-resistant cells|||
|let-7g-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-26a-5p, miR-429||MYC||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin|||
|miR-23b-3p, miR-30d-5p||NOTCH1||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin|||
|miR-155-5p, miR-26a-5p, miR-30d-5p||SMAD1||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin|||
|miR-155-5p, miR-200a-3p||SMAD3||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin|||
|miR-1236-3p, miR-200a-3p, miR-23b-3p, miR-429||ZEB1||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin|||
|miR-200a-3p, miR-429||ZEPM2||MCF10A/HCC1806-EVs||Docetaxel, doxorubicin|||
|miR-155||TGF-β, FOXO-3a, C/EBP-β||MCF-7, MDA-MB-231||Doxorubicin, paclitaxel||MiR-155 transfected cells displayed EMT change and resistance to drug|||
|miR-134||_||Hs578Ts(i)8||_||Anti-Hsp90 drug||The cells transfected with miR-134 increased sensitivity to anti-Hsp90 drug|||
Figure 1. MicroRNAs and the putative target genes associated with drug resistance in breast cancer cells. Arrows indicate activation and bar indicate inhibition. Adr: adriamycin; CSC: cancer stem cell; Doc: docetaxel; Dox: doxorubicin; EMT: epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; Epi: epirubicin; Gem: gemcitabine; Pac: paclitaxel
MiR-222, miR-100, and miR-30a are reported to contribute to drug resistance of MCF-7 cell lines[68,69]. Chen et al. generated two drug resistance models; MCF-7/adriamycin (Adr) and MCF-7/docetaxel (Doc), to investigate the mechanisms of chemotherapy failure. They demonstrated that following transfer of exosomes derived from MCF-7/Adr and MCF-7/Doc to recipient MCF-7/sensitive cells, the levels of miR-100, miR-222, miR-30a, and miR-17 were all significantly increased in the recipient cells. Further, MCF-7/Adr and MCF-7/Doc displayed a marked reduction of PTEN, which is a target of miR-222, compared to MCF-7/sensitive cells. Zhong et al. established three resistant cell lines by exposing the parental MDA-MB-231 cell line to docetaxel (Doc), epirubicin (Epi), and vinorelbine (Vin), respectively. They found some miRNAs were dysregulated in resistant cell lines relative to sensitive MDA-MB-231 cells; there were 10 consistently up-regulated miRNAs in MDA-MB-231/Doc resistant cells and their exosomes, 11 in MDA-MB-231/Epi resistant cells, and four in MDA-MB-231/Vin resistant cells (gene lists are presented in Table 3). Further, 12 of the above 22 miRNAs were significantly up-regulated after neoadjuvant chemotherapy but this change was observed in exosomes and not in tissues. Pathway analysis revealed that the predicted target genes of the corresponding miRNAs were enriched in 17 pathways, which included p53, Wnt, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and ErbB2 signaling pathway.
Similarly, Chen et al. attempted to comprehensively evaluate miRNA expression profiles relevant to chemoresistance using bioinformatic studies. They found that a total of 309 miRNAs were increased and 66 miRNAs were decreased significantly in adriamycin-resistant breast cancer cells compared with parental ones. The top up-regulated miRNAs were miR-23a-3p, miR-27a-3p, miR-30a-5p, and miR-320a and the top down-regulated miRNA was miR-455-3p. KEGG analysis based on the most abundant 13 miRNAs related to adriamycin-resistant cells provided further information that “transcriptional misregulation in cancer” was the most prominent pathway.
Ozawa et al. focused on the mechanisms of action of exosomes derived from TN breast cancer cells with the most aggressive phenotype. When non-tumorigenic breast cells MCF-10A were treated with exosomes derived from HCC1806 TN breast cancer cells, they found a significant increase in cell proliferation and resistance to the therapeutic agents tested (doxorubicin and docetaxel). Gene and miRNA expression profiling revealed 138 genes and 70 miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed among the corresponding MCF-10A and the untreated MCF-10A cells, affecting mostly the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, MAPK, and hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)1A pathways. Ten of these miRNAs control some genes [Table 3], and miR-155 was the one that regulates the greatest number of targets [Figure 1]; which were adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC), hydroxysteroid 17-β dehydrogenase 12 (HSD17B12), MYC, SMAD1 and SMAD3. The relevance of the corresponding genes was also shown by another study. They found miR-155 induction in exosomes isolated from cancer stem cells and resistant cells. When miR-155 exosomes were transfected into recipient sensitive cells, they underwent EMT and gained intermediate resistance to doxorubicin and paclitaxel therapy. It is well-known that miR-155 mediates the loss of CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)-β[74,75], which in turn, causes loss of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and leads to EMT in breast cancer cells. They also observed repression of TGF-β, C/EBP-β and forkhead box O (FOXO)3a in cells transfected with miR-155.
O’Brien et al. reported the association of miR-134 with drug sensitivity. They identified miR-134 as the most substantially down-regulated miRNA in the aggressive TN breast cancer cells, Hs578Ts(i)8 and their exosomes compared to their parental (Hs578T) counterparts. In analysis of clinical samples, miR-134 was found to be significantly down-regulated in breast cancer when compared to its levels in healthy breast tissue. Further, the transfection of miR-134-enriched exosomes into Hs578Ts(i)8 cells reduced the levels of its target genes, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B (STAT5B) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), leading to a reduction in migratory and invasion ability. The corresponding cells showed increased sensitivity to an anti-Hsp90 drug. Their functional studies support the potential use of miR-134 as a therapeutic agent in TN breast cancer.
As described in this section, there is accumulating evidence supporting an association between exosomal miRNA and resistance to anthracycline or taxane-containing agents in breast cancer cells. There are few reports of exosomal miRNAs on the effects of molecular-targeted therapy. It remains a challenge for future research to explore its association with other drugs, such as eribulin or anti-HER2 therapy.
Exosomal miRNAs can be attractive future diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets but there remain some unsolved problems which must be overcome before they can be applied in clinical practice. First, exosome research is based on the findings that a higher secretion of exosomes may be a general feature of cancer patients compared to healthy individuals and miRNAs encapsulated in exosomes reflects originating tumor biology. Nevertheless, some studies have suggested that miRNAs derived from exosomes could not parallel those in primary tumors. For example, Bovy et al. examined the expression levels of exosomal miR-503 in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Interestingly, these levels increased after therapy, whereas miR-503 in primary tumors subjected to this treatment did not change. The authors speculated that the increased miR-503 levels in the circulation after chemotherapy did not originate from the tumor, but from the endothelial cells. Exosomes can be secreted by various types of cells. It will be ideal if cancer-specific exosomes or exosomal miRNAs can be more accurately isolated to investigate how donor tumor cells select or sort the packaging of miRNAs into exosomes to regulate their progression. Several efforts to solve this issue have been undertaken, involving surface protein markers on exosomes, such as CD24 or EpCAM, but no standard markers to differentiate cancer-specific exosomes from those of other origin have been identified.
Second, there is no reliable endogenous gene for normalization of exosomal miRNAs. According to several reports, miR-16-5p, miR-423-3p and miR-191-5p are often recommended as reference miRNAs, since they are constantly expressed through the data[27,80]. Meanwhile snRNU6 is not detectable in most blood samples. However, these reference genes could not always fit exclusively to individual samples with different populations and characteristics. We therefore need to assess them within each dataset. As another method, most suitable miRNAs can be tested by software such as the Genorm Algorithm. In addition to endogenous normalization, exogenous normalization (e.g., cel-miR-39) to remove the technical and interindividual variability are required. Anyway, currently there are no unified and standard reference genes in exosome research.
Finally, there are difficulties in interpretation and statistical analysis of obtained data. Recent studies tend to examine comprehensive expression of exosomal miRNAs such as microarray or next-generation sequencing (NGS), which consequently offer us enormous data regarding candidate miRNAs. It is difficult to determine whether all the differentially-expressed miRNAs have a meaningful role in the process of cancer development. In addition, one miRNA has binding affinity to numerous mRNAs and is involved in the downregulation of many factors that participate in different cancer-relevant signal transduction pathways. Some miRNAs, such as miR-155 and miR-335, have the potential to exert both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic effects[81,82], which confuses the understanding of their biological mechanisms. To explore the biological functions of identified miRNAs, bioinformatic analysis using programs such as TargetScan, miRbase, miRWalk, DIANA-microT and TarBase are needed.
Investigation of the involvement of exosomal miRNAs in breast cancer could provide promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as increasing understanding of the biological mechanisms of cancer development. There is accumulating evidence regarding the role of exosomal miRNAs, especially in functional studies, whereas evidence of their role in the clinical setting remains inadequate. We found few overlapping exosomal miRNAs between the studies, so a large clinical cohort may be required to obtain reproducible data.
With regard to experimental studies, it is of interest that not only cancer cells but surrounding cells such as endothelial cells, pericytes, fibroblasts, and immune cells, secrete exosomes to modulate tumor-favorable or -unfavorable conditions. Considering the potential of exosomes as cancer biomarkers, it is becoming necessary to understand the many findings related to the tumor microenvironment. Although individual miRNAs have been abundantly explored as we describe above, the entry of exosomal miRNAs into clinical practice is hampered since not all the identified miRNAs have been fully checked using clinical samples. To expand the research field into clinical studies could help identify those patients who are most likely to experience recurrence or who are most likely to acquire resistance or respond to therapy. Breast cancer tumors are characterized by extensive heterogeneity (temporal or spatial) and comprise several subtypes with different molecular profiles, which makes it difficult to understand the comprehensive features of disease conditions and identify unique targets. A panel of specific miRNAs as real-time biomarkers, in combination with other conventional clinical biomarkers, might improve the diagnostic and predictive power. We believe that this review will provide the opportunity for a more critical evaluation of the clinical value of exosomal miRNAs.
Participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript: Sueta A
Participated in study design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript: Yamamoto Y, Iwase H
Read and approved the final manuscript: Sueta A, Yamamoto Y, Iwase HAvailability of data and materials
Not applicable.Financial support and sponsorship
None.Conflicts of interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.Consent for publication
© The Author(s) 2019.
1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86.DOIPubMed
2. Rivenbark AG, O’Connor SM, Coleman WB. Molecular and cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer: challenges for personalized medicine. Am J Pathol 2013;183:1113-24.DOIPubMedPMC
3. Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Prat A, Perou CM, Sherman ME, et al. How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more? J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106.DOIPubMedPMC
4. Anderson WF, Luo S, Chatterjee N, Rosenberg PS, Matsuno RK, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and estrogen receptor expression, a demonstration project using the residual tissue repository of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;113:189-96.DOIPubMedPMC
5. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, Gray R, Arriagada R, et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013;381:805-16.DOIPubMedPMC
6. Ring A, Dowsett M. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance. Endocr Relat Cancer 2004;11:643-58.DOIPubMed
7. Duffy MJ, O’Donovan N, McDermott E, Crown J. Validated biomarkers: The key to precision treatment in patients with breast cancer. Breast 2016;29:192-201.DOIPubMed
8. Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, et al. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1134-50.DOIPubMedPMC
9. Nicolini A, Ferrari P, Duffy MJ. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer: Past, present and future. Semin Cancer Biol 2018;52:56-73.DOIPubMed
10. Martelotto LG, Ng CK, Piscuoglio S, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, et al. Breast cancer intra-tumor heterogeneity. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:210.DOIPubMedPMC
11. Zhang M, Tsimelzon A, Chang CH, Fan C, Wolff A, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity in a Trp53-null mouse model of human breast cancer. Cancer Discov 2015;5:520-33.DOIPubMedPMC
12. Diehl F, Li M, Dressman D, He Y, Shen D, et al. Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16368-73.DOIPubMedPMC
13. Beaver JA, Jelovac D, Balukrishna S, Cochran R, Croessmann S, et al. Detection of cancer DNA in plasma of patients with early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:2643-50.DOIPubMedPMC
14. Network CGA. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012;490:61-70.DOIPubMedPMC
15. Coombes RC, Page K, Salari R, Hastings RK, Armstrong AC, et al. Personalized detection of circulating tumor DNA antedates breast cancer metastatic recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2019; doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3663.DOIPubMed
16. Boukouris S, Mathivanan S. Exosomes in bodily fluids are a highly stable resource of disease biomarkers. Proteomics Clin Appl 2015;9:358-67.DOIPubMedPMC
17. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004;116:281-97.PubMed
18. Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6:259-69.DOIPubMed
19. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res 2009;19:92-105.DOIPubMedPMC
20. Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:654-9.DOIPubMed
21. Mulrane L, McGee SF, Gallagher WM, O’Connor DP. miRNA dysregulation in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013;73:6554-62.DOIPubMed
22. Schwarzenbach H. Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15:211.DOIPubMedPMC
23. Cortez MA, Welsh JW, Calin GA. Circulating microRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers in breast cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 2012;195:151-61.DOIPubMedPMC
24. Teoh SL, Das S. The Role of MicroRNAs in Diagnosis, Prognosis, Metastasis and Resistant Cases in Breast Cancer. Curr Pharm De 2017;23:1845-59.DOIPubMed
25. Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM, Ruf IK, Pritchard CC, et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:5003-8.DOIPubMedPMC
26. Gallo A, Tandon M, Alevizos I, Illei GG. The majority of microRNAs detectable in serum and saliva is concentrated in exosomes. PLoS One 2012;7:e30679.DOIPubMedPMC
27. Eichelser C, Stuckrath I, Muller V, Milde-Langosch K, Wikman H, et al. Increased serum levels of circulating exosomal microRNA-373 in receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 2014;5:9650-63.DOIPubMedPMC
28. Thery C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2002;2:569-79.DOIPubMed
29. Stoorvogel W, Kleijmeer MJ, Geuze HJ, Raposo G. The biogenesis and functions of exosomes. Traffic 2002;3:321-30.PubMed
30. Skog J, Wurdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer DH, Gainche L, et al. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:1470-6.DOIPubMedPMC
31. Hessvik NP, Sandvig K, Llorente A. Exosomal miRNAs as Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer. Front Genet 2013;4:36.DOIPubMedPMC
32. Ogata-Kawata H, Izumiya M, Kurioka D, Honma Y, Yamada Y, et al. Circulating exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers of colon cancer. PLoS One 2014;9:e92921.DOIPubMedPMC
33. Rabinowits G, Gercel-Taylor C, Day JM, Taylor DD, Kloecker GH. Exosomal microRNA: a diagnostic marker for lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2009;10:42-6.DOIPubMed
34. Tavoosidana G, Ronquist G, Darmanis S, Yan J, Carlsson L, et al. Multiple recognition assay reveals prostasomes as promising plasma biomarkers for prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:8809-14.DOIPubMedPMC
35. Hannafon BN, Trigoso YD, Calloway CL, Zhao YD, Lum DH, et al. Plasma exosome microRNAs are indicative of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2016;18:90.DOIPubMedPMC
36. Li M, Zhou Y, Xia T, Zhou X, Huang Z, et al. Circulating microRNAs from the miR-106a-363 cluster on chromosome X as novel diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018;170:257-70.DOIPubMedPMC
37. Stevic I, Muller V, Weber K, Fasching PA, Karn T, et al. Specific microRNA signatures in exosomes of triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy within the GeparSixto trial. BMC Med 2018;16:179.DOIPubMedPMC
38. Yoshikawa M, Iinuma H, Umemoto Y, Yanagisawa T, Matsumoto A, et al. Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-223-3p as a minimally invasive biomarker for the early detection of invasive breast cancer. Oncol Lett 2018;15:9584-92.DOIPubMedPMC
39. Ni Q, Stevic I, Pan C, Muller V, Oliviera-Ferrer L, et al. Different signatures of miR-16, miR-30b and miR-93 in exosomes from breast cancer and DCIS patients. Sci Rep 2018;8:12974.DOIPubMedPMC
40. Tormo E, Adam-Artigues A, Ballester S, Pineda B, Zazo S, et al. The role of miR-26a and miR-30b in HER2+ breast cancer trastuzumab resistance and regulation of the CCNE2 gene. Sci Rep 2017;7:41309.DOIPubMedPMC
41. Ichikawa T, Sato F, Terasawa K, Tsuchiya S, Toi M, et al. Trastuzumab produces therapeutic actions by upregulating miR-26a and miR-30b in breast cancer cells. PLoS One 2012;7:e31422.DOIPubMedPMC
42. Sueta A, Yamamoto Y, Tomiguchi M, Takeshita T, Yamamoto-Ibusuki M, et al. Differential expression of exosomal miRNAs between breast cancer patients with and without recurrence. Oncotarget 2017;8:69934-44.DOIPubMedPMC
43. Le MT, Hamar P, Guo C, Basar E, Perdigao-Henriques R, et al. miR-200-containing extracellular vesicles promote breast cancer cell metastasis. J Clin Invest 2014;124:5109-28.DOIPubMedPMC
44. Kia V, Paryan M, Mortazavi Y, Biglari A, Mohammadi-Yeganeh S, et al. Evaluation of exosomal miR-9 and miR-155 targeting PTEN and DUSP14 in highly metastatic breast cancer and their effect on low metastatic cells. J Cell Biochem 2019;120:5666-76.DOIPubMed
45. Zhou W, Fong MY, Min Y, Somlo G, Liu L, et al. Cancer-secreted miR-105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis. Cancer Cell 2014;25:501-15.DOIPubMedPMC
46. Di Modica M, Regondi V, Sandri M, Iorio MV, Zanetti A, et al. Breast cancer-secreted miR-939 downregulates VE-cadherin and destroys the barrier function of endothelial monolayers. Cancer Lett 2017;384:94-100.DOIPubMed
47. Tominaga N, Kosaka N, Ono M, Katsuda T, Yoshioka Y, et al. Brain metastatic cancer cells release microRNA-181c-containing extracellular vesicles capable of destructing blood-brain barrier. Nat Commun 2015;6:6716.DOIPubMedPMC
48. Zhang L, Zhang S, Yao J, Lowery FJ, Zhang Q, et al. Microenvironment-induced PTEN loss by exosomal microRNA primes brain metastasis outgrowth. Nature 2015;527:100-4.DOIPubMedPMC
49. Singh R, Pochampally R, Watabe K, Lu Z, Mo YY, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-10b promotes cell invasion in breast cancer. Mol Cancer 2014;13:256.DOIPubMedPMC
50. Rameshwar P. Breast cancer cell dormancy in bone marrow: potential therapeutic targets within the marrow microenvironment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010;10:129-32.DOIPubMed
51. Ono M, Kosaka N, Tominaga N, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, et al. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells contain a microRNA that promotes dormancy in metastatic breast cancer cells. Sci Signal 2014;7:ra63.DOIPubMed
52. Lim PK, Bliss SA, Patel SA, Taborga M, Dave MA, et al. Gap junction-mediated import of microRNA from bone marrow stromal cells can elicit cell cycle quiescence in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2011;71:1550-60.DOIPubMed
53. Bliss SA, Sinha G, Sandiford OA, Williams LM, Engelberth DJ, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Stimulate Cycling Quiescence and Early Breast Cancer Dormancy in Bone Marrow. Cancer Res 2016;76:5832-44.DOIPubMed
54. Yang M, Chen J, Su F, Yu B, Su F, et al. Microvesicles secreted by macrophages shuttle invasion-potentiating microRNAs into breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer 2011;10:117.DOIPubMedPMC
55. Donnarumma E, Fiore D, Nappa M, Roscigno G, Adamo A, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts release exosomal microRNAs that dictate an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:19592-608.DOIPubMedPMC
56. Rottiers V, Naar AM. MicroRNAs in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012;13:239-50.DOIPubMedPMC
57. Fong MY, Zhou W, Liu L, Alontaga AY, Chandra M, et al. Breast-cancer-secreted miR-122 reprograms glucose metabolism in premetastatic niche to promote metastasis. Nat Cell Biol 2015;17:183-94.DOIPubMedPMC
58. Hannafon BN, Carpenter KJ, Berry WL, Janknecht R, Dooley WC, et al. Exosome-mediated microRNA signaling from breast cancer cells is altered by the anti-angiogenesis agent docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Mol Cancer 2015;14:133.DOIPubMedPMC
59. Muluhngwi P, Klinge CM. Identification of miRNAs as biomarkers for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2017;456:76-86.DOIPubMed
60. Wei Y, Lai X, Yu S, Chen S, Ma Y, et al. Exosomal miR-221/222 enhances tamoxifen resistance in recipient ER-positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;147:423-31.DOIPubMed
61. Miller TE, Ghoshal K, Ramaswamy B, Roy S, Datta J, et al. MicroRNA-221/222 confers tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer by targeting p27Kip1. J Biol Chem 2008;283:29897-903.DOIPubMedPMC
62. Fujii T, Le Du F, Xiao L, Kogawa T, Barcenas CH, et al. Effectiveness of an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:1311-8.DOIPubMedPMC
63. Karagiannis GS, Pastoriza JM, Wang Y, Harney AS, Entenberg D, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism. Sci Transl Med 2017;9:pii: eaan0026.DOIPubMedPMC
64. Shi W, Gerster K, Alajez NM, Tsang J, Waldron L, et al. MicroRNA-301 mediates proliferation and invasion in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2011;71:2926-37.DOIPubMed
65. Ma F, Zhang J, Zhong L, Wang L, Liu Y, et al. Upregulated microRNA-301a in breast cancer promotes tumor metastasis by targeting PTEN and activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Gene 2014;535:191-7.DOIPubMed
66. Lettlova S, Brynychova V, Blecha J, Vrana D, Vondrusova M, et al. MiR-301a-3p Suppresses Estrogen Signaling by Directly Inhibiting ESR1 in ERalpha Positive Breast Cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018;46:2601-15.DOIPubMed
67. Li XJ, Ren ZJ, Tang JH, Yu Q. Exosomal MicroRNA MiR-1246 Promotes Cell Proliferation, Invasion and Drug Resistance by Targeting CCNG2 in Breast Cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;44:1741-8.DOIPubMed
68. Chen WX, Liu XM, Lv MM, Chen L, Zhao JH, et al. Exosomes from drug-resistant breast cancer cells transmit chemoresistance by a horizontal transfer of microRNAs. PLoS One 2014;9:e95240.DOIPubMedPMC
69. Yu DD, Wu Y, Zhang XH, Lv MM, Chen WX, et al. Exosomes from adriamycin-resistant breast cancer cells transmit drug resistance partly by delivering miR-222. Tumour Biol 2016;37:3227-35.DOIPubMed
70. Zhong S, Chen X, Wang D, Zhang X, Shen H, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles of drug-resistance breast cancer cells and their exosomes. Oncotarget 2016;7:19601-9.DOIPubMedPMC
71. Chen WX, Xu LY, Qian Q, He X, Peng WT, et al. Analysis of miRNA signature differentially expressed in exosomes from adriamycin-resistant and parental human breast cancer cells. Biosci Rep 2018;38:pii: BSR20181090.DOIPubMedPMC
72. Ozawa PMM, Alkhilaiwi F, Cavalli IJ, Malheiros D, de Souza Fonseca Ribeiro EM, et al. Extracellular vesicles from triple-negative breast cancer cells promote proliferation and drug resistance in non-tumorigenic breast cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018;172:713-23.DOIPubMedPMC
73. Santos JC, Lima NDS, Sarian LO, Matheu A, Ribeiro ML, et al. Exosome-mediated breast cancer chemoresistance via miR-155 transfer. Sci Rep 2018;8:829.DOIPubMedPMC
74. Yin Q, McBride J, Fewell C, Lacey M, Wang X, et al. MicroRNA-155 is an Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene that modulates Epstein-Barr virus-regulated gene expression pathways. J Virol 2008;82:5295-306.DOIPubMedPMC
75. Xiao B, Liu Z, Li BS, Tang B, Li W, et al. Induction of microRNA-155 during Helicobacter pylori infection and its negative regulatory role in the inflammatory response. J Infect Dis 2009;200:916-25.DOIPubMed
76. Xie S, Chen H, Li F, Wang S, Guo J, et al. Hypoxia-induced microRNA-155 promotes fibrosis in proximal tubule cells. Mol Med Rep 2015;11:4555-60.DOIPubMed
77. O’Brien K, Lowry MC, Corcoran C, Martinez VG, Daly M, et al. miR-134 in extracellular vesicles reduces triple-negative breast cancer aggression and increases drug sensitivity. Oncotarget 2015;6:32774-89.DOIPubMedPMC
78. Bovy N, Blomme B, Freres P, Dederen S, Nivelles O, et al. Endothelial exosomes contribute to the antitumor response during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy via microRNA transfer. Oncotarget 2015;6:10253-66.DOIPubMedPMC
79. Meng Y, Sun J, Wang X, Hu T, Ma Y, et al. Exosomes: A Promising Avenue for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019;18:1533033818821421.DOIPubMedPMC
80. Hu Z, Dong J, Wang LE, Ma H, Liu J, et al. Serum microRNA profiling and breast cancer risk: the use of miR-484/191 as endogenous controls. Carcinogenesis 2012;33:828-34.DOIPubMed
81. Bertoli G, Cava C, Castiglioni I. MicroRNAs: New Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Therapy Prediction and Therapeutic Tools for Breast Cancer. Theranostics 2015;5:1122-43.DOIPubMedPMC
82. Martin EC, Conger AK, Yan TJ, Hoang VT, Miller DF, et al. MicroRNA-335-5p and -3p synergize to inhibit estrogen receptor alpha expression and promote tamoxifen resistance. FEBS Lett 2017;591:382-92.DOIPubMedPMC
83. Ellsworth RE, Blackburn HL, Shriver CD, Soon-Shiong P, Ellsworth DL, et al. Molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer: State of the science and implications for patient care. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2017;64:65-72.DOIPubMed
Sueta A, Yamamoto Y, Iwase H. The role of exosomal microRNAs; focus on clinical applications in breast cancer. Cancer Drug Resist 2019;2:847-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2019.17
Quantities of Full-Text Views Each Month
Quantities of PDF Downloads Each Month
Quantities of Citations Each Year
* All the data come from Crossref
et al., Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment, 2021
et al., Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment, 2021
et al., Cancer Drug Resistance, 2020
et al., Cancer Drug Resistance, 2020
et al., Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2020
et al., Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2020
et al., Cancer Drug Resistance, 2020
et al., Cancer Drug Resistance, 2020
et al., Cancer Drug Resistance, 2020
et al., Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2020